Abstract
The fungal pathogens of spruce are well known in Europe and elsewhere. Therefore, it was surprising to discover a new fungal species and genus in Central Europe that attacks the pollen cones of three spruce species. The new ascomycete forms apothecia on stromatized pollen cones of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Serbian spruce (Picea omorika) in mountain areas and on West Himalayan spruce (Picea smithiana) planted in urban lowland regions of Switzerland, Germany, and Italy. It was also detected in France, based on metabarcode sequences deposited in the GlobalFungi database. Its sudden appearance and the different origins of the host trees in Europe and Asia leave the origin of the fungus unclear. The new fungus might be a neomycete for Europe. A phylogenetic analysis using SSU, LSU, ITS, RPB2, and TEF1 sequences classified the fungus as a member of Sclerotiniaceae (Helotiales, Leotiomycetes). However, it differs morphologically from the other genera of this family in having an ascus without apical apparatus containing four mainly citriform spores with 16 nuclei each. Furthermore, it is the only known cup fungus that parasitizes pollen cones of conifers by stromatizing their tissue and infecting pollen grains. The fungus does not seem to cause major damage to the spruce populations, as only a few pollen cones per tree are affected. All this leads us to describe the newly discovered fungus as the new species and new genus Microstrobilinia castrans, the fungus that castrates pollen cones of spruce.
Introduction
The conifer genus Picea (Pinaceae) includes about 35 species that occur in the northern temperate and boreal regions of the world. However, in mountainous areas, some species reach far into the south, such as Picea chihuahuana Martinez in Mexico (Schmidt 2004; Schmidt-Vogt 1987). In Europe, Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., the native Norway spruce, is one of the most important timber species with a long history of economic use and forestry cultivation. This has led to its widespread distribution and high frequency in plantations and sylvicultural settings outside its natural distribution range. In addition, several non-native spruce species, e.g., the North American Picea pungens Engelm. and Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière, are planted in forests or as ornamental trees in parks and gardens in Europe. Due to the economic importance of spruce trees, their diseases and parasites are very well investigated (e.g., Kujala 1950; Schmidt-Vogt 1989; Butin 2011; Farr and Rossman 2022).
All spruce species are monoecious conifers with large woody female seed cones and small male pollen cones. Several fungi are known to parasitize on the seed cones, such as the rust fungi Thekopsora areolata (Fr.) Magnus and Chrysomyxa pyrolata (Körn.) G. Winter (Butin 2011; Phillips and Burdekin 1992). Others use the woody cones as substrate without causing obvious damages. Examples are Phragmotrichum chailletii Kunze occurring on the scales of still hanging cones and Piceomphale bulgarioides (P. Karst.) Svrček or Strobilurus esculentus (Wulfen) Singer on fallen cones. The seeds can also become infected and killed by Caloscypha fulgens (Pers.) Boud. (Paden et al. 1978; Kolotelo et al. 2001). However, no fungus has been known to grow exclusively on the pollen cones of spruce species until now (Farr and Rossman 2022).
In early spring 2018, the apothecia of an unknown cup fungus were first discovered on the pollen cones of two Picea smithiana (Wall.) Boiss (West Himalayan spruce) planted in the arboretum of the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL in Birmensdorf, Switzerland. This spruce species is native from Afghanistan to Nepal where it grows at altitudes of 2000–4000 m above sea level (asl.) in mixed forests (Schmidt-Vogt 1987). The ascomycete was thereafter also found on P. smithiana in other parks in Switzerland. A more detailed investigation revealed that this new fungus also occurs on the native P. abies in the Swiss Alps and Jura mountains and in mountainous regions of southern Germany and northern Italy. Additionally, it was found on the non-native Picea omorika (Panč.) Purk. (Serbian spruce) planted in parks and gardens.
Despite intensive literature research and consultation of the specialist for inoperculate Ascomycetes Hans-Otto Baral (Tübingen, Germany, personal communication) and his expert network, no fungal species or genus could be found that matched the characteristics of the newly discovered fungus. The aim of this study was therefore to clarify the taxonomy of the newly discovered pathogen, what resulted in the description of a new monotypic genus.
Materials and methods
Sampling
Pollen cones stromatized by the new fungus and bearing primordial to mature apothecia were regularly collected from two P. smithiana trees in the arboretum of the Swiss Federal Institute WSL. To determine host specificity, distribution, and abundance of the encountered fungus, various Picea species also of other regions in Switzerland, several sites in southern Germany, and one site in Italy were explored (Table S1). These included individual Picea abies trees in pastures and at forest edges in lowland and mountainous forests. Planted exotic Picea omorika and P. smithiana trees were examined in urban areas. For the latter, the official tree inventories of 30 Swiss cities and municipalities were evaluated to find locations of P. smithiana. This tree species was only registered in the city of Zurich (Stadt Zürich 2021), in the canton of Geneva (Wyler 2021) and in Lausanne (canton Vaud) (Table S1). Also, P. smithiana trees were examined in the Swiss National Arboretum of the Vallon de l'Aubonne (www.arboretum.ch). At all sites, other spruce species growing in the vicinity of P. smithiana, especially P. abies and P. omorika, were closely inspected. The collection points (Table S1) were visualized in QGIS 3.16 using (i) free vector maps from www.naturalearthdata.com; (ii) the distribution map of Picea abies from Caudullo et al. (2017, 2018) for the map of Europe; and (iii) free geodata from the Swiss Federal Office of Topography (swisstopo) for the map of Switzerland. A selection of vouchers was deposited in the fungal herbarium of ETH Zurich (ZT Myc). The remaining samples are stored at WSL (Table S1). Five collections (including the type collection) representing the three host tree species and main regions of Switzerland were chosen for cultivation and molecular investigations (Table 1).
Fungal isolations from different sources
Single ascospore isolations were obtained from ten stromatized pollen cones with mature apothecia from each of the 5 representative samples (Table 1). To induce sporulation, cones were incubated in moist chambers for 1 day at 20 °C. One apothecium was separated from each cone using tweezers and fixed with double-sided adhesive tape upside down on the underside of the lid of a 9 cm Petri dish containing WA + S (Table 2). After half a day at 20 °C, 10 individual germinating spores per apothecium were picked under a binocular microscope (100 × magnification) with a fine needle and each was transferred to a fresh DMA + S (Table 2) plate (in total 500 isolates). For the isolation of the fungus from the stromatized pollen cones, one cone per representative sample was cut open and 4 small pieces (about 1 mm3) of blackened tissue were removed from the inside with a sterile scalpel and placed on a DMA + S plate (in total 20 isolates). All cultures were then incubated at 20 °C for 2 weeks. For each of the 5 representative samples, one single spore culture and one culture from the cones were chosen for comparison of ITS sequences (in total 10). Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses were based on a total of 5 isolates (1 × from pollen cone, 4 × from single spores) (Table 1). A single spore culture of Elliottinia kerneri (Wettst.) L.M. Kohn was produced and analyzed in the same way. The isolates were deposited in the culture collection of the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (CBS), Utrecht, the Netherlands (Table 1).
To investigate which parts of the pollen cones are infected by the fungus at what time, ten freshly developed, still immature pollen cones showing early symptoms of an infection (deformations, brown discolorations, and white mycelium between the scales) were collected from one P. smithiana tree at the WSL site on May 2, 2019. Ten healthy looking freshly developed pollen cones were taken as control. These 20 cones were surface disinfected by shortly wiping off the surface with 70% (v/v) ethanol before they were longitudinally cut in half with a scalpel. At the tip and the central part of each cone, small pieces of tissue were removed from (i) outer scales, (ii) pollen sacs and (iii) the central axis (Fig. S1), resulting in six isolation tests per healthy and six per pollen cone with early symptoms (2 × 60 tissue pieces). All tissue pieces were placed on DMA + S plates and incubated at 20 °C for 2 weeks (Fig. S2). The identity of colonies emerging from them was determined by culture morphology and ITS sequencing.
Phenology
The observation of the pollen cones of the same P. smithiana tree mentioned above started at the WSL site on April 12, 2019. On May 2, 2019, ten freshly developed, immature pollen cones showing early symptoms of an infection were marked. At this time of the year, the fruiting bodies on old stromatized pollen cones had already sporulated. As a control, 10 healthy looking freshly developed pollen cones were marked as well. These cones were regularly observed throughout the year. The final inspection took place on December 16, 2019. Phenology data of the fungal development are supplemented by 158 field observations on three Picea species from about 80 collections sites at different altitudes and at different times of the year (Table S1).
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing
About 1 cm2 of mycelium was harvested from the edge of each fungal culture, lyophilized and ground to fine powder. DNA was extracted using the Kingfisher 96/Flex machine and kit (TermoFisher Scientific, LGC Genomics 169 GmbH, Berlin, Germany) according to the manufacturers’ protocols.
PCRs were performed using the following primer pairs (annealing temperatures in brackets) and a standard PCR protocol with 35 cycles. ITS: ITS1/ITS4 (50 °C) (White et al. 1990); LSU: LR0R/LR6 (52 °C) (Rehner and Samuels 1994; Vilgalys and Hester 1990); SSU: NS1/NS4 (48 °C) (White et al. 1990); TEF1: EF1-983F/ EF1-2218R (55 °C) (Rehner and Buckley 2005); RPB2: fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR (58 °C) (Liu et al. 1999). Additionally, a new primer pair for RPB2 more specific to the Sclerotiniaceae was designed: RPB2-Scl-F: 5′-GGWCAAGCTTGTGGYTTGGT-3′ and RPB2-Scl-R: 5′-CGGATTGATAACAYTTACGAGGA-3′ (53 °C). DNA sequencing in two directions was carried out by Microsynth AG (Balgach, Switzerland) using the same forward and reverse primers as in the PCRs. Resulting sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).
Comparison with sequences in databases
Similar published sequences were retrieved by BLAST searches (search option blastn, Altschul et al. 1990) by using the full-length ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequence or partial ITS1 and ITS2 sequences as queries against the NCBI (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, date: 2022–03-24) and the UNITE database (Nilsson et al. 2019, https://unite.ut.ee, date: 2022–03-24). Furthermore, we checked for the presence of highly similar sequences in high-throughput sequencing data from environmental samples in the GlobalFungi database (Větrovský et al. 2020) (2022–03-24). To determine the taxonomic position of the species, the corresponding SSU-, LSU-, RPB2-, TEF1-sequences were also compared with accessions deposited in GenBank by BLAST searches.
Phylogenetic analyses
A combined SSU-ITS-LSU-RPB2-TEF1-alignment was created. The newly generated sequences were combined with sequences of 10 species of Sclerotiniaceae from GenBank that revealed the highest similarity to the query sequences. The data set was supplemented by 10 species of the sister families Rutstroemiaceae and Cenangiaceae following Pärtel et al. (2017) (Table 1). Lacking sequences were supplemented with unknown bases (N). All alignments were performed using MAFFT v.7.017 (Katoh and Standley 2013) without further manual optimizations. Ambiguously aligned regions within the resulting alignments were excluded from analyses with Gblocks v.0.91b (Castresana 2000). The final combined alignment used for phylogenetic analyses was deposited at TeeBASE (ID 29960).
Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses were performed by RAxML v. 8.2.11 (Stamatakis 2014) as implemented in Geneious prime 2021.1.1 (https://www.geneious.com), using the GTR GAMMA model with partitions according to the respective submatrices (SSU, ITS1, 5.8, ITS2, LSU, RPB2, and TEF1; 1st, 2nd, and 3rd positions of codons of RPB2 and TEF1 exons). Analyses were based on ML and 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates. Bayesian analyses were performed with MrBayes 3.2.1 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) as implemented in Geneious prime 2021.1.1 using Encoelia furfuracea as outgroup. The analysis was run under the general time reversible (GTR) model, with gamma distribution rate variation across sites and a proportion of invariable sites. Two parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs with four chains and 1.1 million generations were performed and every 200th tree was sampled. The first 2000 trees were discarded (burn-in) before calculating posterior probabilities in the majority rule consensus trees. Posterior probability (PP) values equal to or greater than 0.95 were considered significant. In the same way, phylogenies of the individual gene regions and combinations of them (ITS-LSU vs RPB2-TEF1) were calculated and analyzed to reveal possible topological incongruences between them.
Morphology
One hundred fifty-eight specimens (Table S1) were studied. Measurements and photos were performed with a Zeiss Discovery V8 stereo lens equipped with a Zeiss Axiocam 506 digital camera and a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 microscope equipped with a Axiocam 208 color digital camera and Zen 2.3 software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Germany). Sections of fresh material were made by hand; thin sections of dried apothecia and stromatized pollen cones were made using a hand microtome. The preparations were investigated in water, 2.5% and 5% potassium hydroxide solution (KOH), lactic acid (with and without cotton blue) or Congo red. The iodine reaction was tested with Melzer’s reagent (MLZ) and Lugol’s solution (IKI), with and without KOH-pretreatment (Baral 1987; Baral et al. 2020). Asci (n = 20) and spores (n = 50) from fresh, sporulating apothecia, therefore considered to be alive, each of five collections representing the hosts Picea smithiana (ZT Myc 66340, ZT Myc 66345), P. abies (ZT Myc 66346, ZT Myc 66349), and P. omorika (ZT Myc 66365) were measured in water. In addition, 10 asci and 20 ascospores each were measured in 5% KOH from the same specimens after they were air-dried for 6–12 month. These asci and ascospores were considered to be dead. Mean value and length width (L/W) ratio were calculated. Results were given as minimum–mean–maximum value.
Cultural characteristics of the ex-type culture (CBS 149465) were studied using three different growth media (two without and one with antibiotics, Table 2). Mycelial plugs (3 × 3 mm) cut out from the margin of an actively growing DMA + S culture were placed in the center of each of two 9 cm PDA, DMA, and DMA + S plates. These 6 subcultures were incubated at room temperature (20 °C) in the dark. The culture morphology was observed, and their radial growth was measured (in mm) after 3, 7, 14, and 21 days. The shortest and the longest distance from the center were measured (Table 3).
Nucleus staining
Hand sections of fresh and air-dried apothecia were carefully heated in 5% KOH and then washed twice in tap water. The sections were placed in 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (AppliChem, Darmstadt Germany) solution (10 µg/1 ml H2O) on a microscope slide. The preparation was covered with a cover glass and squeezed gently until individual asci were released. Nuclei of asci and spores were immediately counted using a ZEISS Axio Vert.A1 inverted phase fluorescence microscope (365 nm filter) and the camera/software system as specified earlier.
Note: In a pre-test of the DAPI staining without KOH treatment, the cell content of young asci showed strong fluorescence that did not allow the counting of nuclei. The fluorescence of the cell contents was also observed without DAPI staining in fresh tap water.
Results
Fungal isolations from different sources
The 500 single spore isolates and 20 isolates obtained from stromatized pollen cones of the 5 representative samples showed no remarkable differences in culture morphology. The ten ITS sequences obtained from ascospores and stromatized cone tissues were identical. They significantly differed from ITS sequences of similar related species in the NBCI data bank (see below). No other fungi were isolated from the stromatized pollen cones. No colonies emerged from control samples (Fig. S2a). Tissue pieces from cones showing early symptoms generated 56 colonies (90%), while no colonies emerged from 4 samples. The 56 colonies represented one single morphotype (Fig. S2b). One isolate per cone was selected and their identity with the new fungus was confirmed by ITS sequencing. No other fungal species was isolated from the fresh pollen cones.
Phenology
On April 12, 2019, all buds of pollen cones of the P. smithiana at WSL site were still closed and covered by bud scales. On April 25, buds started to burst. The exposed pollen cones showed no symptoms. The first brown discolorations and deformations appeared on April 30 on approx. 5% of the fresh pollen cones. The ten healthy pollen cones marked on May 2 opened by stretching their axis and released pollen grains from early May to early June. All of them had fallen off by December. The ten symptomatic pollen cones marked on May 2 remained closed and did not stretch or stretched only partially on one side with the pollen grains remaining in the cones. Apothecia were formed on nine of the marked cones during the summer while one cone had fallen off in December. The 158 field observations revealed a similar phenology depending on weather and altitude above sea level (Table S1, taxonomy part).
Comparison with sequences in databases
The five representative samples (Table 1) from the different host trees and geographical locations had identical sequences in all five gene regions examined. The BLAST search in the NCBI database and the analysis of its output revealed that the fungus belongs to the Sclerotiniaceae. All sequences analyzed had a high percentage of identity with the corresponding sequences of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, type species of the genus Sclerotinia and the Sclerotiniaceae: SSU > 99%, LSU > 95%, ITS > 92%, TEF1 > 95%, RPB2 > 85%. Similarly, high percentages of identity were found with other members of this family. BLAST searches for similar ITS sequences in the UNITE database identified entries with a maximum sequence similarity of 95.5%, most of them belonging to the species hypothesis cluster Sclerotiniaceae sp./SH1518609.08FU with a distribution in Europe and North America (Kõljalg et al. 2021). A search for environmental genetic variants in GlobalFungi further identified two records of a ITS2 sequence 100% identical to the newly obtained ITS sequences. They were obtained from two air samples taken by a high-volume PM10 sampler at the Puy de Dôme meteorological station (1465 m asl.), Auvergne, France on April 26, and May 10, 2017 (Tignat-Perrier et al. 2020).
Phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 1)
Phylogenies inferred from individual loci had similar topologies (data not shown). The maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of the combined SSU-ITS-LSU-RPB2-TEF1-alignment resulted in trees with matching topologies. The new fungus appeared in a well-supported clade of the Sclerotiniaceae. It is placed in sister position to the main sub-clade of Sclerotiniaceae containing Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Botrytis cinerea Pers., Ciboria caucus (Rebent.) Fuckel, Dumontinia tuberosa (Bull.) L.M. Kohn, Elliottinia kerneri, Monilinia laxa (Aderh. & Ruhland) Honey, Sclerencoelia fraxinicola Baral & Pärtel and Sclerencoelia pruinosa (Ellis & Everh.) Pärtel & Baral. Pycnopeziza sejournei (Boud.) Whetzel & W.L. White and Ciboria viridifusca (Fuckel) Höhn. appeared in more basal positions in the Sclerotiniaceae. The species of Rutstroemiaceae form the sister clade to the Sclerotiniaceae.
Taxonomy
Microstrobilinia Beenken & Andr. Gross, gen. nov.
MycoBank 845510
Etymology: The genus name refers to the substrate: “microstrobilus” means “small cone” in Greek and is the botanical term for the male pollen cone of conifers.
Diagnosis: Member of Sclerotiniaceae Whetzel (1945) emend. Holst-Jensen et al. (1997) (Helotiales, Leotiomycetes), different from all other members of the Sclerotiniaceae in 4-spored, cylindrical asci with a short stipe and an iodine negative apex without apical apparatus, mature ascospores containing 16 nuclei, parasitizing pollen cones of Picea spp.
Type species: Microstrobilinia castrans Beenken & Andr. Gross
Microstrobilinia castrans Beenken & Andr. Gross, spec. nov.
MycoBank 845511
(Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8).
Etymology: The species name refers to the fact that the fungus prevents the male reproduction of its host: “castrans” is Latin for castrating/emasculating.
Short diagnosis: Apothecia brown, short stipitate, desiccation-tolerant, 1–5 mm in diameter, growing on stromatized pollen cones of Picea spp.; ectal excipulum of brown textura globulosa-angularis; asci cylindric, av. 108 × 14.6 µm when alive, iodine negative without visible apical apparatus, 4-spored, ascospores citriform, and almond-shaped, av. 25 × 13 µm when alive, containing 16 nuclei when mature.
Holotype: Switzerland, Canton Zurich, Birmensdorf, arboretum of the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, on pollen cones of Picea smithiana, solitary tree in a park, 47.36047 N, 8.45633 E, 555 m asl. May 17, 2018, leg. A. Gross, ZT Myc 66340; ex type culture CBS 149465.
Additional specimens examined are given in Table S1.
Description: Apothecia scattered on stromatized pollen cones of Picea spp.: primordial apothecia single or in groups of up to 3 in the middle of cone scale near the scale axis, black, spherical, 0.2–0.5 mm in diam., opening at apex; excipulum pinkish violet turning bluish blackish in KOH (reaction reversible in acid), external excipulum with globose cells in outer layer, inner part hyalin, primordial hymenium containing paraphyses only. Mature apothecia 1–5 mm in diam., desiccation-tolerant, slightly cupulate to flat at maturity and when hydrated, shell-like folded when dry, flanks 200–260 m thick, stipitate, stipe up to 0.5 mm long, ca. 0.5 mm wide; hymenium cream to light brown when young, grayish when old, margin white to light brown ciliated; outside dark brown to black, white-pruinose when young, bare and rough to wrinkled when old.
Ectal excipulum 35–70 µm thick, dark brown; outermost cell layer composed of globose cells 4–16 µm in diam. (textura globulosa), walls brown, approximately 0.3 µm thick, smooth; inner part composed of 2–3 (–4) rows of globose to rectangular cells (textura globulosa-angularis-prismatica), cells vertically oriented, 5–25 × 4–12 µm, walls thin, light brown; on the surface of flanks with scattered groups of globose to irregularly shaped cells partly with red-brown content turning bluish to blackish violet in KOH, reaction reversible in acid, with bundles of hyaline hyphal hairs of approximately 20–50 × 2–5 µm; at margin with colorless to light brown, multiseptate, flexuous hyphal hairs, up to 100 µm long, 3–6 µm wide, with thin, smooth walls. Medullary excipulum 30–50 µm thick, composed of parallel running hyphae (textura porrecta), hyphae 3–5 µm wide, walls incrusted with small brown granules. Subhymenium 10–20 µm thick, light brown, composed of 2–3 µm wide, interwoven hyphae (textura intricata). Hymenium sometimes with a pinkish to reddish brown pigment turning blue to blackish-violet in KOH, reaction reversible in acid. Asci broadly cylindrical with hemispheric apex, basis abruptly narrowing into a short cylindrical stipe arising with two septa from non- or very small-perforated croziers, 97–108.1–130 µm long (90–95.5–110 µm long without stipe) and 12–14.6–18 µm wide when alive, 77–88.5–97 × 11–12.3–14 µm when dead; stipe 4–8.4–20 µm long and 3–4.2–6 µm wide; wall all over 1 µm thick, without apical apparatus, inamyloid, dehiscing by apical split; 4-spored (rarely 6-spored); sometimes asci with violet content in water turning blackish-blue in KOH. Ascospores obliquely 1-seriate, filling two-thirds of mature, fully turgescent asci, nearly the whole ascus when unripe or dead, hyaline, non-septate, broadly navicular to citriform, pointed at both ends, almond-shaped at the ascus tip, rarely ovoid or ellipsoid, (17–) 21–25.5–31.5 (–33.5) × 8.5–13.1–17.5 µm, L/W ratio 1.3–2–3.3 when alive, 17–23.6–27 × 10–11.8–14 µm, L/W ratio 1.5–2–2.5 when dead (citriform ascospores with two extended ends usually longer than almond-shaped or ovoid spores), with smooth walls, up to 0.5 (–1) µm thick, thinner at pointed ends, with granular content and 0.5–1.5 µm large guttules, with 16 nuclei at maturity; discharged ascospores rarely with one medium septum; discharged ascospores germinating at their ends in overmature apothecia, germ tubes 2–5 µm wide, forming the anamorph (see below). Paraphyses of same length as asci, cylindrical, 2–3 µm wide, mostly simple, sometimes branched, tips sometimes slightly capitate, 3–4 (–5) µm wide, multi-septate, walls colorless, content of terminal cells with small, colorless to light brown, 0.5–1.5 µm large guttules in water, disappearing in KOH.
Anamorph emerging from discharged, germinating ascospores that form multiply branched hyphae 3–5 µm wide, terminating in 6–17 µm long and 3–4 µm wide phialides showing distinct collarettes, producing globose to ovoid, guttulate, 2–3.5 × 1.5–2 µm large microconidia.
Recently infected pollen cones in spring (March to April) without apothecia, yellow to light brown, normally ovoid shaped or showing deformations, 0.7–1.3 × 0.5–0.7 cm on P. abies and P. omorika, 1.1–2.0 × 0.7–1.3 cm on P. smithiana, compact, not stretching, not releasing their pollen; inside with white, cottony mycelium, hyphae 1–2 µm thick, hyalin, between and within cone axis, scales, and pollen sacs, penetrating and growing within pollen grains. Infected pollen cones in summer and autumn with spherical primordia (May to July) or cup shaped, immature apothecia (August to October), light brown; cone axis dark brown to black, stromatized, with hyphae growing within the partly dissolved plant tissue; pollen grains adhering to each other due to mycelium spreading in pollen sacs, penetrated and later completely filled by hyphae consisting of short, inflated, 7–16 × 4–8 µm large cells, with one to two large drops 3–6 µm in diam per cell. Infected pollen cones in spring of second year with mature apothecia, gray to dark brown; fully stromatized inside; stroma replacing most of the plant tissue of the cone axis and scales; stroma rind not clearly differentiated, 10–20 µm thick, dark-brown, composed of collapsed and brown hyphae; medulla light, hyaline, hyphae fused, with 1–2.5 (–3.5) µm thick walls, with (1–) 2–4 (–5) µm wide lumen, arranged parallelly (textura porrecta) along the remaining central part of the cone axis and along the scales, incorporating remaining red brown plant cells and tracheids; pollen grains often empty. Infected pollen cones in summer of second and following years dark brown to black, with old apothecia and new primordia, remnants of the old apothecia remaining until autumn; stromatized pollen cones may remain on trees for several years.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA consisting of superficially formed, tomentose aerial mycelium, dark gray in center, margin irregularly lobed, white; media turning dark brown to black in center. Colonies on DMA and DMA + S consisting of submerged hyphae, surface velvet with sparse aerial mycelium, dark gray to black in center, margin irregularly lobed, white; media turning dark brown to black in the center, with blackish brown spots at the margin. Colony growth rate identical on PDA and DMA, initially more slowly spreading on DMA + S, all colonies about the same diam. after 21 days (Table 3).
Myrioconium-like sporodochia sporadically formed on agar surface, with small slime droplets, 0.5–1 mm in diam., with a basal, nearly pseudoparenchymatous centrum of short, highly branched hyphae consisting of 5–10 × 3–6 µm large cells, phialides 6–15 µm × 2–3 µm, with distinct collarettes; microconidia globose to broadly ovoid, guttulate, 2–3 × 1.5–3 µm.
Hosts, habitats, and distribution: In Europe, on native Picea abies in mountain regions of Switzerland (Jura, Prealps and Alps), Germany (Black Forest, Prealps and Alps), France (Auvergne) and Italy (north-eastern Alps), 850–1900 m asl., on solitary trees in meadows or forest edges and interior; on cultivated Picea omorika in urban areas of Switzerland, (540–) 890–1260 m asl.; on cultivated Picea smithiana in urban areas of Switzerland, 380–560 m asl.
Notes: The apothecia on the large stromatized pollen cones of P. smithiana tend to be larger (up to 5 mm in diam.), while they are smaller on P. abies and P. omorika (up to 4 mm at max.). No other morphological differences were found between the collections on the different spruce species. Old stromatized cones, which still produced apothecia, are often overgrown with algae, lichens, and mosses. From this observation we conclude that infected pollen cones remain attached to the trees and produce apothecia probably for several years. The large pollen cones of P. smithiana remain attached much longer (often more than three years) than the small ones of the other two spruce species (probably 2 years at most).
The length of asci depends strongly on their maturity. Immature asci are shorter in autumn to early spring than in late spring. During autumn to early spring spores fill almost the entire length of asci while in late spring, when the mature asci are fully stretched and turgescent, their spores only fill the upper two-thirds of the asci. The size of mature spores, however, does not change noticeably over the winter but is relatively variable due to their shape (Fig. 4n). The shape of the spores depends mainly on their position in the ascus. In most cases, the apical spore is almond-shaped with the rounded end orientated upwards, the two middle ones are pointed at both ends, and the fourth bottom spore usually has a pointed and a somewhat blunter end, so that they fill the young ascus optimally (Fig. 4f, l, m).
The infested pollen cones were collected mainly from low-hanging branches of solitary or small groups of spruce trees on meadows and at forest edges, where they were easily accessible. They were often found on the shade side of the trees. Occasionally they were also found in upper crowns of fallen trees within the forest. Lowland records are almost only known from the exotic P. smithiana. All examined trees of this species were infested with M. castrans (in total 12 trees), apart from those that were still too young to flower. In the lowlands, M. castrans was found only twice on P. omorika planted in the immediate vicinity of infested P. smithiana trees. All other seven collections from P. omorika came from trees planted in urban areas in mountainous regions above 890 m asl. All 133 findings from the native P. abies came from its natural distribution range between 850 and 1900 m asl. In lower regions, P. abies was never found to be infested even if it grew directly next to infested P. smithiana trees. Microstrobilinia castrans was not found on any other spruce species planted in the arboreta, gardens, and parks visited. It was very common in some places but in other places with an apparently similar habitat, it was very rare or could not be found at all despite an intensive search. It is also noteworthy that of several spruces standing next to each other, often only one or a few were infested. Whether there is a difference in susceptibility between the tree species and/or individuals remains up to further investigations.
Possibilities of confusion: Only the pyrenomycete Gemmamyces piceae (Borthw.) Casagr. (Melanommataceae, Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes), the causal agent of spruce bud blight disease, can cause similar symptoms on pollen cones (own observations). In contrast to the cup-shaped apothecia of M. castrans, G. piceae produces spherical black perithecia and conidiomata (Černý et al. 2016; Jaklitsch and Voglmayr 2017). Thus, their fruiting bodies are not to be confused. Furthermore, the cones affected by G. piceae are not stromatized. Its hyphae do not grow into the pollen grains like those of M. castrans. The pollen remains powdery and is not agglomerated as in the case of an infection with M. castrans. Sometimes, both species were found together on one twig, but not on the same cone.
Ascospore genesis (Fig. 8): Starting with one nucleus per ascus, the three nuclear divisions occur in the common cytoplasm of the ascus resulting in eight nuclei arranged in four pairs. Afterwards, one spore forms around each pair. This leads to four ascospores per ascus. Then, the nuclei start to divide within the spores three times in succession until there are 16 nuclei per spore. This already happens in late autumn. In the following spring, almost only spores with 16 nuclei were observed in ripe apothecia.
Discussion
Phylogeny vs. morphology
Our molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1), which correspond well with that of Pärtel et al. (2017, Fig. 1), classified M. castrans with strong support in the Sclerotiniaceae (Helotiales, Leotiomycetes). The Sclerotiniaceae was established by Whetzel (1945) to accommodate a group of fungi in the Helotiales (Leotiomycetes) producing apothecial ascomata arising from stromata, specifically with inoperculate asci, ellipsoid ascospores, and globose microconidia. Holst-Jensen et al. (1997) emended the family based on a molecular phylogenetic analysis of rDNA sequence data. They split off the species with simple stromata and grouped them in the newly created Rutstroemiaceae. The Sclerotiniaceae were narrowed to species with distinct sclerotia or stromata that are well differentiated in a rind and a medulla. Currently, the family consists of 31 genera, 10 of which are monotypic (Wijayawardene et al. 2020). Characteristics of the asci and spores distinguish M. castrans from any other member of the Sclerotiniaceae. The typical inoperculate ascus of the Sclerotiniaceae has a subtruncate apex and a distinct iodine positive (rarely iodine negative) apical apparatus with an annulus. Its middle part is cylindrical and contains 8 (rarely 4) elliptical spores, and its basis is long tapering (e.g., Verkley 1998; Whetzel 1945; Pärtel et al. 2017). The ascus of M. castrans differs significantly from this Sclerotinia-type, as it has no apical apparatus and a base that narrows abruptly to a short stipe. The apex of the ascus is round and has the same wall thickness as the ascus sides. Thus, no differentiation in the structure of the apex is visible in light microscopy. Even after treatment with KOH, there was no reaction with any of the iodine reagents. Iodine-negative ascal tips also exist in other genera, such as Sclerencoelia, but their apical ascus walls show differentiation in thickness, shape, and structure, and open by a pore (Pärtel et al. 2017 called them “reduced Sclerotinia-type”). The ascus of M. castrans opens with a split that rips open the wall at the tip when the spores are mature. In the molecular phylogeny, M. castrans appears among species having inoperculate asci in our phylogeny. Thus, we assumed that M. castrans lost the ascus apical apparatus secondarily. This could be interpreted as an adaptation to its microhabitat. Sherwood (1981) assumed that several corticolous and lignicolous discomycetes that grow in tree crowns “lost all traces of an active spore discharge mechanism,” since gravity and wind is sufficient for spore dispersal. Verkley (1995) also describes “a strong regression in the structure of the apical apparatus” of Cenangium ferruginosum Fr. (Cenangiaceae, Helotiales) that causes the ascus to open by ripping at the tip. Cenangium ferruginosum occurs on the bark of dead branches and twigs attached to pine trees and thus has a comparable microhabitat as M. castrans. Other examples of asci without a visible apical apparatus are found in Mycosphaerangium and Neomelanconium. Both genera also belong to the Cenangiaceae and form apothecia growing on air-exposed parts of their host trees (Voglmayr et al. 2020). Like the mentioned examples from the Sclerotiniaceae (Pärtel et al. 2017) and Cenangiaceae (Voglmayr et al. 2020), the apothecia of M. castrans show further adaptation to the air-exposed habitat in treetops. They are desiccation-tolerant (poikilohydric) and can respond to the changing humidity on site. They close when they dry out within a few hours and revive quickly when they get wet again. Dry apothecia ejected spores after rehydration that were still viable, as shown in the production of single spore cultures (see above). This desiccation-tolerance is also shown by the fact that vital looking asci and ascospores can be found in air-dried specimens kept at room temperature for 6 months.
Microsrobilinia castrans differs from other members of Sclerotiniaceae in their number of ascospores per ascus and number of nuclei per spore. Four-spored asci also occur in other genera of the family: Kohninia linnaeicola Holst-Jensen, Vrålstad & T. Schumach. has 4-nucleate spores (Holst-Jensen et al. 2004)., Sclerotinia gIaciaIis Frank Graf & T. Schumach. has 1 (–2) nuclei per spores (Graf and Schumacher 1995), and the nucleation of S. tetraspora Holst-Jensen & T. Schumach. is variable and can reach from two to four to eight nuclei per ascospore (Holst-Jensen and Schumacher 1994). However, the 4-spored asci of these species are of the Sclerotinia-type and their ascospores are ellipsoidal (Holst-Jensen et al. 2004; Graf and Schumacher 1995; Holst-Jensen and Schumacher 1994).
Four-spored asci can develop in two ways. Either four spores are formed per ascus, or eight spores are formed, of which four degenerate (e.g., Raju 2008; Raju and Perkins 2000). The ascospore genesis of the mentioned four-spored species of the Sclerotiniaceae were not described in detail (Graf and Schumacher 1995; Holst-Jensen and Schumacher 1994; Holst-Jensen et al. 2004; Kohn 1979). We used DAPI staining of the nuclei to clarify ascospore genesis in M. castrans (Fig. 8). Up to the 8-nucleus stage of the ascus, the development in M. castrans proceeds according to the textbook (e.g., Webster and Weber 2007). Afterwards, the process continues in a different way as spores are formed around nucleus pairs and not around individual nuclei. A similar genesis of four-spored asci has been described in detail for Coniochaeta tetraspora Cain (Coniochaetaceae, Coniochaetales), Neurospora tetrasperma Shear & B.O. Dodge (Sordariaceae, Sordariales), and Podospora anserina (Rabenh.) Niessl (Podosporaceae, Sordariales) (Raju and Perkins 2000; Raju 2008; Thompson-Coffe and Zickler 1994). In these species, it could be shown that each of the four ascospores encloses nuclei of opposite mating types. These species are therefore called pseudo-homothallic fungi (Grognet and Silar 2015; Raju and Perkins 2000; Raju 2008; Thompson-Coffe and Zickler 1994). Whether M. castrans is a pseudo-homothallic fungus needs further investigation. Multinucleate ascospores are also found in species of the Sclerotiniaceae with 8-spored asci (Kohn 1979). Sclerotinia sclerotiorum has 2 nuclei, and S. minor Jagger and S. trifoliorum Erikss. have 4 nuclei per ascospore (Wong and Willetts 1979; Kohn 1979). Two to 4 (6) nuclei per ascospore have been reported for Dumontinia tuberosa (Kohn 1979). Ciboria latipes Holst-Jensen & T. Schumach. has binucleate ascospores (Holst-Jensen and Schumacher 1994). Further multinucleate ascospores are known from fungi with 8-spored asci such as in the genus Morchella (Morchellaceae, Pezizales), which can have 20 or more nuclei per ascospore (Du et al. 2020). The pH-dependent color reaction of excipulum cells, which is particularly distinct in the primordia, and in the hymenium is also a remarkable character of M. castrans.
Other features of the new species fit well into the morphological concept of the Sclerotiniaceae as newly defined by Holst-Jensen et al. (1997) and confirmed by Pärtel et al. (2017). Its apothecia arise from stromata that are differentiated into a rind and a medulla covering host tissue. Microconidial anamorphs similar to those found in M. castrans have been described for other genera of the Sclerotiniaceae. In Sclerotinia, conidiophores are located in the hymenium (Kohn 1979; Senn-Irlet and Peter 2016). The sporodochia of Myriosclerotinia (Schumacher and Kohn 1985) and Septotinia (Whetzel 1937) are formed on infected host tissue. In Sclerencoelia, microconidia are formed directly by ascospores or phialides formed by hyphae shortly after ascospore germination (Pärtel et al. 2017; Juzwik and Hinds 1984) as in M. castrans. Myrioconium-like sporodochia formed in culture have been described from several genera of Sclerotiniaceae (Kohn 1979; Schumacher and Kohn 1985; Juzwik and Hinds 1984; Whetzel 1937). The microconidia of M. castrans are formed late in spring when the infection of the new pollen cones has already occurred. Therefore, we assume that they have the function of spermatia.
Ecologically, the new species is also characterized by unique features. It is the only known fungal species that parasitizes the pollen cones of spruce trees by infecting pollen grains. The only other species of the Sclerotiniaceae that also attacks pollen cones of conifers is Elliottinia kerneri occurring on fir trees. This species differs from M. castrans not only in the host plant but also in producing spherical sclerotia that replace the pollen cones (Kohn 1979; Senn-Irlet et al. 2021). According to our phylogenetic analysis, E. kerneri is not closely related to the new species but to Botrytis, Dumontia, and Sclerotinia, which also produce tuberous sclerotia (Whetzel 1945). Consequently, the infection of conifer pollen cones may have evolved in the Sclerotiniaceae independently. Various other groups of fungi use free pollen grains as occasional or main nutrition source (Hutchison and Barron 1997; Wurzbacher et al. 2014). Some of them, such as the species of the genera Retiarius (Magyar et al. 2017a; Oliver 1978) and Mycoceros (Magyar et al. 2017b), both anamorphic Orbiliomycetes, are specialized to catch and parasitize free, wind-borne pollen grains (see also Baral et al. 2020, p. 145). However, we could not find any other example of a fungus that parasitizes pollen grains already inside the male cones of conifers.
In summary, the characteristics of M. castrans that are aberrant for Sclerotiniaceae are obviously adaptations to its special lifestyle. Other discomycetes from similar microhabitats in tree crowns show similar adaptations, although they belong to different genera or families (Pärtel et al. 2017; Voglmayr et al. 2020). Sherwood (1981) therefore speaks of “convergent evolution in discomycetes from bark and wood.”
All this justifies the erection of the new genus Microstrobilinia in Sclerotiniaceae with the one species M. castrans for this exceptional fungus.
Host preferences
The altitudinal host preferences of M. castrans are remarkable: below 600 m asl., it occurred mainly on the non-native P. smithiana and above 800 m asl. on P. abies and P. omorika. At the same elevation, the three tree species flower at the same time (own observations in Aubonne, Birmensdorf and Geneva). The size of the pollen cones is the most striking difference between these species and could thus explain this altitudinal distribution pattern. Picea smithiana has much larger stromatized pollen cones that can store more nutrients and humidity than those of the other two species. Thus, the pollen cones of P. smithiana can persist for more than three years on the tree, those of the other two species only up to 2 years. Therefore, M. castrans might survive unfavorable periods or even whole years better on pollen cones of P. smithiana than on pollen cones of P. abies and P. omorika at similar altitudes. These features could be advantageous for the fungus in the comparably dry microclimates of urban habitats at lower altitudes. At higher elevations with higher humidity, the fungus can obviously grow and reproduce on the smaller pollen cones of P. abies and P. omorika. This would also fit with the observation that M. castrans was only found once on P. omorika at the WSL site in spring 2018, but not after the extremely dry summers of 2018 and 2019. On P. smithiana, on the other hand, apothecia were consistently observed, but almost only on old pollen cones. Freshly infected cones were very rare or absent from 2020 onwards. However, this explanatory hypothesis still needs to be verified by more and longer observations.
We never observed that all pollen cones of a tree were infected, but usually only very few. Thus, M. castrans most probably does not significantly reduce the fertility and reproduction ability of Picea spp.
Origin and distribution
Recently, some new undescribed species of fungi have appeared in European forests, and it is not always certain whether they are indigenous or have been introduced. Cryphonectria carpinicola D. Rigling, T. Cech, Cornejo & Beenken, which causes bark canker on hornbeam (Cornejo et al. 2021), and Petrakia liobae Beenken, Andr. Gross & Queloz, which causes necroses on beech leaves (Beenken et al. 2020), are such examples. While the former might have been confused with similar looking Cryphonectria and Nectria species from Europe, the conspicuous symptoms caused by P. liobae may not have been overlooked in the past.
The origin of M. castrans is unclear as well. In our opinion, it is highly unlikely that this conspicuous fungus could have been overlooked over the last centuries (e.g., Kujala 1950; Schmidt-Vogt 1989; Butin 2011; Farr and Rossman 2022), especially, if the species would always have been as common and widespread as it is today. Its consistent occurrence on the exotic P. smithiana could also indicate a non-native origin of M. castrans and that it could be a neomycet in Europe. Only more data on the European and worldwide distribution and population genetics of the fungus will probably help clarifying the origin of the new genus and species. In particular, the Asian native range of P. smithiana should be considered. For Europe, we expect that M. castrans can be found throughout the Alps and other mountain regions, e.g., in France, Austria, and Slovenia. I might also be present in more northern and north-eastern parts of the Picea abies distribution range. The use of new techniques like spore traps and metabarcoding might also be useful in unraveling the current distribution range of M. castrans. Like this, we detected M. castrans in France via the GlobalFungi database of environmental sequences. This genetic detection seems plausible, as the used spore trap was placed at a typical habitat of M. castrans, a mountain meadow surrounded by mixed forests with spruce, and sampled during a period when the fungus sporulates (Tignat-Perrier et al. 2020). Several recent studies have explored the use of spore sampling for fungal biodiversity monitoring (e.g., Abrego et al. 2018; Castaño et al. 2019; Ovaskainen et al. 2020; Tignat-Perrier et al. 2020; Redondo et al. 2020) and pathogen surveillance (Van der Heyden et al. 2021). Global and long-term monitoring projects are therefore important, as are initiatives like GlobalFungi, allowing an effective search for deposited DNA sequences (Baldrian et al. 2022). However, to understand the ecology and function of the species, the classical work of field mycologists and morphologists is still equally important and needed.
Data availability
All data and materials have been deposited in publicly accessible holdings.
References
Abrego N, Norros V, Halme P, Somervuo P, Ali-Kovero H, Ovaskainen O (2018) Give me a sample of air and I will tell which species are found from your region: molecular identification of fungi from airborne spore samples. Mol Ecol Resour 18:511–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12755
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi
Baldrian P, Větrovský T, Lepinay C, Kohout P (2022) High-throughput sequencing view on the magnitude of global fungal diversity. Fungal Divers 114:539–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-021-00472-y
Baral HO (1987) Lugol’s solution/IKI versus Melzer’s reagent: hemiamyloidity, a universal feature of the ascus wall. Mycotaxon 29:399–450
Baral HO, Weber E, Marson G (2020) Monograph of Orbiliomycetes (Ascomycota) based on vital taxonomy. Part I + II. National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg, 1752 pp
Beenken L, Gross A, Queloz V (2020) Phylogenetic revision of Petrakia and Seifertia (Melanommataceae, Pleosporales): new and rediscovered species from Europe and North America. Mycol Progress 19:417–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01567-7
Butin H (2011) Krankheiten der Wald- und Parkbäume, 4th edn. Ulmer, Stuttgart, p 303
Castaño C, Bonet JA, Oliva J, Farré G, Martínez de Aragón J, Parladé J et al (2019) Rainfall homogenizes while fruiting increases diversity of spore deposition in Mediterranean conditions. Fungal Ecol 41:279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2019.07.007
Castresana J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334
Caudullo G, Welk E, San-Miguel-Ayanz J (2017) Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data Brief 12:662–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.007
Caudullo G, Welk E, San-Miguel-Ayanz J (2018) Picea abies chorology. Figshare, Fileset. https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Picea_abies_chorology/5110768 (accessed 05.05.2022)
Černý K, Pešková V, Soukup F, Havrdová L, Strnadová V, Zahradník D, Hrabětová M (2016) Gemmamyces bud blight of Picea pungens: a sudden disease outbreak in Central Europe. Plant Pathol 65:1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12513
Cornejo C, Hauser A, Beenken L, Cech T, Rigling D (2021) Cryphonectria carpinicola sp. nov. Associated with hornbeam decline in Europe. Fungal Biol 125(5):347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2020.11.012
Du XH, Wu D, Kang H, Wang H, Xu N, Li T, Chen K (2020) Heterothallism and potential hybridization events inferred for twenty-two yellow morel species. IMA Fungus 11:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-020-0027-1
Farr DF, Rossman AY (2022) Fungal databases, U.S. national fungus collections, ARS, USDA. https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ (accessed 05.05.2022)
Graf F, Schumacher T (1995) Sclerotinia glacialis sp. nov., from the alpine zone of Switzerland. Mycol Res 99(1):113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80324-9
Grognet P, Silar P (2015) Maintaining heterokaryosis in pseudo-homothallic fungi. Commun Integr Biol 8(4):e994382. https://doi.org/10.4161/19420889.2014.994382
Holst-Jensen A, Schumacher T (1994) Sclerotiniaceous species on Rubus chamaemorus: morphoanatomical and RFLP studies. Mycol Res 98(8):923–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80264-5
Holst-Jensen A, Kohn LM, Schumacher T (1997) Nuclear rDNA phylogeny of the Sclerotiniaceae. Mycologia 89(6):885–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1997.12026859
Holst-Jensen A, Vrålstad T, Schumacher T (2004) Kohninia linnaeicola, a new genus and species of the Sclerotiniaceae pathogenic to Linnaea borealis. Mycologia 96(1):135–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2005.11833003
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
Hutchison LJ, Barron GL (1997) Parasitism of pollen as a nutritional source for lignicolous Basidiomycota and other fungi. Mycol Res 101(2):191–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095375629600233X
Jaklitsch WM, Voglmayr H (2017) Three former taxa of Cucurbitaria and considerations on Petrakia in the Melanommataceae. Sydowia 69:81–95. https://doi.org/10.12905/0380.sydowia69-2017-0081
Juzwik J, Hinds TE (1984) Ascospore germination, mycelial growth, and microconidial anamorphs of Encoelia pruinosa in culture. Can J Bot 62:1916–1919. https://doi.org/10.1139/b84-261
Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30(4):772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
Kohn LM (1979) A monographic revision of the genus Sclerotinia. Mycotaxon 9(2):365–444
Kõljalg U, Abarenkov K, Tedersoo L, Nilsson R H, May T, Larsson, K-H, Döring M, Schigel, D, Ryberg M, Sánchez-Ramírez S, et al. (2021) SH1518609.08FU. UNITE Community. https://plutof.ut.ee/#/doi/https://doi.org/10.15156/BIO/SH1518609.08FU
Kolotelo D, Van Steenis E, Peterson M, Bennett R, Trotter D, Dennis J (2001) Seed handling guidebook. B.C. Ministry of Forests, Tree Improvement Branch, Victoria, B.C., Canada, 106 pp. https://rngr.net/publications/seed-handling-guidebook
Kujala V (1950) Über die Kleinpilze der Koniferen in Finnland, Ascomycetes, Fungi Imperfecti, Uredinales. Metsätieteellisen Tutkimuslaitoksen Julkaisuja 38:1–121
Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Mol Biol Evol 16:1799–1808. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092
Magyar D, Merényi Z, Körmöczi P, Bratej Z, Kredics L (2017a) Phylogenetic analysis and description of two new species of pollen parasitic Retiarius (anamorphic Orbiliomycetes). Nova Hedwigia 105:411–423. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2017/0420
Magyar D, Merényi Z, Udvardy O, Kajtor-Apatini D, Körmöczi P, Fülöp A, Bratek Z, Kredics L (2017b) Mycoceros antennatissimus gen. et sp. nov.: a mitosporic fungus capturing pollen grains. Mycol Progress 17:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-017-1275-3
Nilsson RH, Larsson K-H, Taylor AFS, Bengtsson-Palme J, Jeppesen TS, Schigel D et al (2019) The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D259–D264. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1022
Oliver DL (1978) Retiarius gen nov: phyllosphere fungi which capture wind-borne pollen grains. Trans Br Mycol Soc 71(2):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(78)80098-9
Ovaskainen O, Abrego N, Somervuo P, Palorinne I, Hardwick B, Pitkänen J-M et al (2020) Monitoring Fungal Communities with the Global Spore Sampling Project. Front Ecol Evol 7(511):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00511
Paden JW, Sutherland JR, Woods TAD (1978) Caloscypha fulgens (Ascomycetidae, Pezizales): the perfect state of the conifer seed pathogen Geniculodendron pyriforme (Deuteromycotina, Hyphomycetes). Can J Bot 56(4):2375–2379. https://doi.org/10.1139/b78-289
Pärtel K, Baral H-O, Tamm H, Põldmaa K (2017) Evidence for the polyphyly of Encoelia and Encoelioideae with reconsideration of respective families in Leotiomycetes. Fungal Divers 82:183–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0370-0
Phillips DH, Burdekin DA (1992) Diseases of forest and ornamental trees, 2nd edn. Macmillan Press, London, p 599
Raju NB (2008) Six decades of Neurospora ascus biology at Stanford. Fungal Biol Rev 22:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2008.03.003
Raju NB, Perkins DD (2000) Programmed ascospore death in the homothallic ascomycete Coniochaeta tetraspora. Fungal Genet Biol 30:213–221. https://doi.org/10.1006/fgbi.2000.1217
Redondo MA, Berlin A, Boberg J, Oliva J (2020) Vegetation type determines spore deposition within a forest–agricultural mosaic landscape. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 96:fiaa082. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa082
Rehner SA, Buckley E (2005) A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97:84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832842
Rehner SA, Samuels GJ (1994) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol Res 98:625–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7
Schmidt PA (2004) Picea. In: Schütt, Weisgerber, Schuck, Lang, Stimm, Roloff: Lexikon der Nadelbäume. Nikol, Hamburg, ISBN 3–933203–80–5, 265–278
Schmidt-Vogt H (1987) Die Fichte, ein Handbuch in zwei Bänden. Bd. 1, Taxonomie, Verbreitug, Morphologie, Ökologie, Waldgesellschaften. Paul Parey, Hamburg, Berlin, 647 pp
Schmidt-Vogt H (1989) Die Fichte, ein Handbuch in zwei Bänden. Bd. 2/2, Krankheiten, Schäden, Fichtensterben. Paul Parey, Hamburg, Berlin, 607 pp
Schumacher T, Kohn LM (1985) A monographic revision of the genus Myriosclerotinia. Can J Bot 63:1610–1640. https://doi.org/10.1139/b85-224
Senn-Irlet B, Peter M (2016) Sclerotinia cirsii-spinosissimi, a new species from the Alps. Ascomycete.org 8(5):235–240. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1040189
Senn-Irlet B, Blaser S, Dougoud R, Stöckli E, Gross A, Mürner R (2021) Ascomyceten der Schweiz – seltene und wenig dokumentierte Arten. Cryptogamica Helvetica 23:1–432
Sherwood MA (1981) Convergent evolution in discomycetes from bark and wood. Bot J Linn Soc 82:15–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1981.tb00948.x
Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
Stadt Zürich (2021) Baumkataster. https://www.stadt-zuerich.ch/ted/de/index/gsz/planung-und-bau/inventare-und-grundlagen/baumkataster.html (consulted June 2021)
Thompson-Coffe C, Zickler D (1994) How the cytoskeleton recognizes and sorts nuclei of opposite mating type during the sexual in filamentous ascomycetes. Dev Biol 165:257–271. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1994.1251
Tignat-Perrier R, Dommergue A, Thollot A, Magand O, Amato P, Joly M et al (2020) Seasonal shift in airborne microbial communities. Sci Total Enviro 716:137129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137129
Van der Heyden H, Dutilleul P, Charron J-B, Bilodeau GJ, Carisse O (2021) Monitoring airborne inoculum for improved plant disease management. A Review Agron Sustain Dev 41:40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00694-z
Verkley GJM (1995) Ultrastructure of the ascus apical apparatus in species of Cenangium, Encoelia. Claussenomyces and Ascocoryne Mycol Res 99(2):187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80885-X
Verkley GJM (1998) Ultrastructure of the ascus apical apparatus in ten species of Sclerotiniaceae. Mycol Res 97(2):179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80240-2
Větrovský T, Morais D, Kohout P, Lepinay C, Gallardo CA, Hollá SA et al (2020) GlobalFungi: Global database of fungal records from high-throughput-sequencing metabarcoding studies. Sci Data 7:228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0567-7
Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
Voglmayr H, Jaklitsch WM, Tello S (2020) Mycosphaerangium and Neomelanconium (Cenangiaceae) are closest relatives: phylogenetic relationships, morphology and a new species. Mycol Progress 19:1329–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01630-3
Webster J, Weber R (2007) Introduction to Fungi. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 841 pp. 12 pl
Whetzel HH (1937) Septotinia, A New Genus of the Ciborioideae. Mycologia 29(1):128–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1937.12017184
Whetzel HH (1945) A synopsis of the genera and species of the Sclerotiniaceae, a family of stromatic inoperculate discomycetes. Mycologia 37(6):648–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1945.12024025
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322
Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Al-Ani LKT et al (2020) Outline of fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 11(1):1060–1456. https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8
Wong JAL, Willetts HJ (1979) Cytology of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and related species. J Gen Microbiol 112:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-112-1-29
Wurzbacher C, Rösel S, Rychła A, Grossart H-P (2014) Importance of saprotrophic freshwater fungi for pollen degradation. PLoS ONE 9(4):e94643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094643
Wyler N (2021) Inventaire cantonal des arbres isoles. Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève: https://opendata.swiss/en/dataset/__260 (consulted June 2021)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Swiss mycologists Stefan Blaser, Jonas Brännhage, Jörg Gilgen, Ueli Graf, Beatrice Senn-Irlet, Max Steck, and Elisabet Stöckli for searching, locating, and reporting the new species by sending us material and images. Without their help, we would not have been able to record the distribution of the species in Switzerland so well. For technical support of the molecular work, we thank the team of the plant pathology laboratory of WSL Birmensdorf and Nicolò Tartini. We thank Benno Augustinus (WSL, Birmensdorf) for the evaluation of the tree inventory data. In addition, we thank the responsible persons of the cities and municipalities for providing the tree inventory data. Special thanks go to Hans-Otto Baral (Tübingen, Germany) for his thorough and critical review of the manuscript. His recommendation to check the number of nuclei of the ascospores was very valuable for the study. He and his expert network helped us kindly to clarify that the species is apparently new to science. Finally, we would like to thank Hans-Josef Schroers (section editor, Mycological Progress) for his help to improve the manuscript in form and language.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Lib4RI – Library for the Research Institutes within the ETH Domain: Eawag, Empa, PSI & WSL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L. Beenken wrote the main part of the manuscript and performed the morphological and phylogenetic analyses. S. Stroheker and V. Dubach isolated the fungus from individual spores and pollen cones, cultivated it, and executed the experiment on the recently infected pollen cones. They were also responsible for the phenological observations at the WSL. V. Dubach drew Fig. 7c. M. Schlegel had the idea to search for the fungus in the GlobalFungi database and carried it out. V. Queloz helped designing the study and writing the text. A. Gross was the first to discover the new fungus and determined after preliminary molecular and morphological investigations and consultation with ascomycete specialists that the fungus is a new species. He initiated and designed the experiments and genetic investigation, including the design of the new primer pair. Furthermore, he gave significant input to unravel the biology of the species. All authors wrote their paragraphs, helped with sampling the new fungus, and proofread the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Section Editor: Hans-Josef Schroers
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Beenken, L., Stroheker, S., Dubach, V. et al. Microstrobilinia castrans, a new genus and species of the Sclerotiniaceae parasitizing pollen cones of Picea spp.. Mycol Progress 22, 14 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-023-01865-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-023-01865-w
Keywords
- GlobalFungi database
- Helotiales
- Multinucleate ascospores
- Neomycete
- New genus
- New species
- Phenology
- Pollen parasite